Saturday, February 17, 2007

The Three Wisemen

On The Three Wisemen: Montana Freeman, Pogo, and Carl Jung


"I would not blame the instruments of destruction because we are the instruments of destruction and thats that!" ... Montana Freeman, wise elder of our Naitve American brothers and sisters.

ALL of us need to heed the wisdom in our elder, MF's, words who echoes the words of the wisest of the wise, the late, great Pogo when he said...

I have met the enemy and he are I.

But just what does this mean? Perhaps the words of another late, great, wise man may be of help....

When an inner situation is not made conscious, it appears outside as fate... Carl Jung.

There IS a war outside. And it is manifest in many forms. We see it. We discuss and debate on who and what to blame... all forces "out there". The PTB, the Elites, the neo-cons, the Christians, the Muslims, the NWO, Busco, global warming, peak oil, capitalism, socialism, american idol, lucifer and his minions, the masons, the Chinese, the media, the human condition, and so on.

But the real war is on Consciousness itself. These other things "out there", "outside", are the "noise". The "reflection." Yet, those words, "war on consciousness" can be impotent to drive home the point. So let me put it another way....

THE WAR IS FOR LIFE ITSELF.

Yours, mine, the collective. And it is real. It has always been so. BUT, it is coming to a head as never before. The Mother of Everything is seeing to it and the Earth that She IS is moving to clear. She can hold no more of this imbalance and denial.

There is definitly an agenda to take life down. It is a force to recon with and I need to realize this.

How and why am I serving this agenda? I need to realize this too and examine this thouroughly and profoundly for therein lay the understandings that the war between good and evil has been a war of each to OVER-POWER the other and thus, even "good" has been fooling itself.

There IS a perfection to the Universe. It could also be called True Understanding and Balance. When there is balance the "things" of the universe are "free" to be in their right places. There is no threat and thus no need for one to over-power another. That which is good. Which is within love and life. That which is evil. Which is outside love and life. All these "things" in their right place for there is a place for them that feels good and right for all in this Universe. And they would be happy there.

When there is imbalance we can find the tools within it to seek and find balance. This is also woven into the fabric of the perfection of the universe.

Is the concept just something for the dreamers who dream still of the original dream? The whole idea smacks of the utopian eh? Yet, this is the lesson. It is this I seek.

3 Comments:

Blogger murph & freeacre said...

Palooka,
This is really profound and I have nothing adequate to say in response. I have to re-read it a bunch and think about it. It's always been really hard for me to figure how much of "them" they are, and how much "they" are "a sum of our fears." Hard to figure...
How much of a difference would it make if I owned my part, and transformed it or let it go. Would I have to give up my sense of dramatic fear and righteous indignation (two of my personal favorites)? Where's the fun in that?? Hummmm....

Wednesday, March 07, 2007 11:22:00 PM  
Blogger Palooka's Revenge said...

FA... thankyou for your visit and your comment. the profound is simple. we are the ones who complicate it.

as to your questions, absolutely not. our terrors and rage have much to teach us. in fact you will find the drama is enhanced by understandings that will come if we can allow their responses to lead us without acting it out on others or hurting ourselves.

these are energies. energies are vibration. vibration is life. which is another profundity who's time has come.

the problem lay in the conditioning we have placed on our emotional bodies to give us acceptable responses rather than a true response to experience in the moment. if we can allow that, we can use that input to make good judgements and decisions for ourselves.

the conditioning has been enhanced over time and much time is in the books. and so, the conditioning is massive. and so, the unraveling is complicated.

we thought we had better ideas but complicated what should be a simple dynamic where every micro-moment would be profound. had we fell in love with the "negative" emotions early on the simplicity would still be so. they tell us what is going on with the micro body politic in relation to the macro moment.

this misunderstanding was not wrong. it just was. but much damage was done and much has been lost while we were stuck in our rightous indignations which only showed us its view of things. was it a love affair with itself while all the rest cried in pain in the darkness from the tortures of our own denials? we have much to recover and much to atone for as we do it. but it is not to god. it is to ourselves and what we judged as unacceptable.

we have to be careful though and not let our guilt gods get us. interpretations of what atonement demands are the stuff of guilt. the operative word here is compassion. and true compassion is free of guilt and oozing with love and understanding. if it has guilt in it it is merely a mirror that we still have guilt. guilt is not love. but it has been in love's place as understandings about this have not evolved. that is not wrong either. it just is and we are where in the great lesson.

Thursday, March 08, 2007 7:59:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Palooka,

One of the things I haven't heard you deal with, (I think anyway)_ is what is called a socialization process. Any group has certain behaviors that are considered acceptable or at least tolorated and other behaviors not. Some are even survival. Example; the eskimos (from what I have read) have to teach the little kids very early on and absolutely that you don't walk on thin ice, good way to get dead. They use shame. When the little toddlers finally get outside and start walking around the adults stand around and wait for the kid to walk into some thin ice and get wet. They all gather round and point and laugh and shame them. What I understand is no eskimo kid will ever again walk on thin ice. Very effective for survival.

For all of our liberal advocates making denial, most of our societies training is somewhat similar. But, it used to be effective for the most part, now, some question about that.

So what I am seeing is that there may be a survival part of this denial thing that you talk about. Do you see a difference in the complexity of a society and the relative amount of denial within that society? Do you see that denial evenly as a negative aspect?

Sunday, March 11, 2007 7:57:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home