Three Chords And The Truth
Three chords and the truth. That was how Harlan Howard, the, hands-down, dean of country music songwriters, defined country music. It wasn't his intent to define his own writing that way. But. nevertheless, it did.
That was thirty years ago and ever since hundreds have borrowed or stole that hook line to further their own agendas. Up until today the latest was Sara Evans who used it as the title cut for her highly acclaimed, freshman CD.
Today I'm stealing it to pen this entry.
The truth...
LBJ, Lyndon Baines Johnson, 36th president of the United States, WAS A LEAD PLAYER IN THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK, John Fitzgerald Kennedy, the 35th president of the United States on November, 22, 1963!
It was likely sanctioned by powers greater than he lurking behind the scenes. But he was a primary force.
The operative word here is COUP.
And coups are seldom pulled off alone. By that I mean by one boss. Its almost always a cabal at the top. An alignment between a few to several who conspire toward an end. It can probaly be argued that LBJ was just a pawn in the game. Maybe we'll never know for sure. But given what was at stake for LBJ its admittable to consider him as a major player. As a part of the cabal that ordered and carried out the hit. Yes, carried out. "Cuz, a hit like this? You don't contract something like this. Its done in-house. Today we're going to take a look at the recently revealed truth and the 3 chords in the nasty song that implicates LBJ in the JFK killing. The chords were the operatives carrying out the agenda.
The three chords...
CORD MEYER>>>DAVID MORALES>>>FRENCH GUNMAN GRASSY KNOLL!!
There are minor chords that spin off the majors...
Cord Meyer (ironic name eh?)>>>Bill Harvey
Who's the Harlan Howard? The author? The tell-all teller of the truth?
E. HOWARD HUNT.
Harlan Howard. Howard Hunt. Another irony eh?
Who's E Howard Hunt?
E Howard Hunt. was a CIA operative known most widely as leader of the plumbers of Watergate fame. 3 years before Hunt died in Jan at the crusty old age of 88, he sat sat up in his sickbed, put pen to pad, and laid down the truth. At the top of the page he wrote "LBJ". Then drew a down arrow and wrote "Cord Meyer". According to Hunt, Meyer was an easy mark. His wife, the former Mary Pinchot, was one of JFK's favorite mistresses. Not only did they share the bed, they shared the bowl. Pinchot Meyer was murdered less than a year after JFK.
Below Meyer another down arrow. Then, "David Morales".
Then another down arrow and below that, "French Gunman Grassy Knoll".
To the right of Meyer was another arrow connecting to the name Bill Harvey.
Meyer, Morales, and Harvey are former CIA operatives and pop up midst various conspiracy theories surrounding the Kennedy killing. Presumably the French gunman is the Corsican Mafia assassin Lucien Sarti, who has figured prominently in assassination theories as well.
It is also widely held that Hunt was indeed one of the famed three "tramps" intercepted, detained, photographed and released without arrest or charges near the grassy knoll at the Dealy Plaza scene of the assassination of Kennedy.
How do we know all this? Hunt's eldest son, Saint John, has the goodies. Obtained from his father and reported by Eric Hedgegaard in the March 07 edition of Rolling Stone Rolling Stone.
Read the Rolling Stone article. It tells Saint John's story who is telling his dad's story. Listen to what his dad said in a tape he sent to his son. View a copy of the paper upon which his dad connected the dots of the major players.
Read in St John's story in the RS article of how he came to suspect many years ago that his father was involved. The epiphany was the photo of the 3 tramps. "Nobody has features like my father. I'm his son. That's him!" Read how he tells of helping his dad wipe fingerprints from microphones and walkie talkies and various other articles of espionage in the middle of the night and then, following his father's instruction, "got rid of it". And the 100 grand he ran for him. And the typewriter thrown in the lake for him. All this in the wake of Watergate investigations. The article reports there is another hand written document by E Howard with more details and names.
In the wake of the RS publication St John was contacted by 60 Minutes. A meeting was had in San Francisco between he and an executive producer. He told the producer the whole story, showed him the documents and played the tape for him. Producer flew back to New York where the network's investigative team had both the handwriting and the voice print analyzed by independent experts which concluded beyond a doubt that the author was indeed E Howard Hunt. The excited producer contacted St John. He said everything had checked out, said this was a major story, and promised a piece would be done. That has never happened and St John's queries to CBS are being ignored.
Nowhere in mainstream media will you find anything about this bombshell. But there is a renewed effort going on to reinforce the Oswald-lone-assassin conclusion. Most notable is recent documentary by the Discovery Channel and a new book by Vincent Bugliosi of Helter Skelter fame. Bugliosi was on one of those radio talk shows recently and the interviewer told him about the tape. Bugliosi said he doubted such a tape existed. The interviewer just happened to have a copy all cued up and played it for Bugliosi.
Bugliosi's response? "Saint John Hunt is not a credible source."
Those words are being reiterated by anyone who is presented with the tape who has some unseen interest in furthering the lone assassination theory. If you read the Stone interview you know Saint John Hunt was a meth addict and dealer for 20 years. Arrested for it too. At least twice. So certainly his past is shady and can lead one to question his credibility.
BUT.....
Is it his voice on the tape? Is it his handwriting on the papers?
HELL NO!
So his credibility is a moot issue.
Just what is going on here? Think about it. Can the psyche deal with the reality? That a president could be so evil and power hungry that he would have his predecessor killed on live TV in front of the whole nation? Is this why so many people can't see the current president for what he really is?
St John was interviewed on Coast2Coast AM and I listened to the archived edition last night. I told my Dear Wife (DW) about the tape, the papers, and the RS article. I played her part of the interview. It literally threw her into a tizzy. She got heavily triggered by it and couldn't even listen to the tape (which they played during the interview) until she'd moved some through the initial triggers.
It'd triggered me too but not to the extent that it triggered DW. I was listening to the radio when the shots rang out. The moment is burned into my psyche. I still vividly remember exactly what I was doing and where I was at the time. It was a traumatic event. I've witnessed years of analysis both official and unofficial. I've done a ton of reading through the years. I highly suspected from the beginning that there were sinister forces involved and it was highly likely LBJ was involved.
I also highly suspected that LBJ, like many of our so-called leaders, was an operative in service to hidden, yet extremely powerful, forces that controlled him and us then, and control us still today. Why else would a good-ole-boy, street fighter, who had attained the highest political position in the nation, step down unless he was clandestinely forced to?
Viet Nam you say? You say he showed deep concern for what was happening in Viet Nam as witnessed by this photo ? He's in the oval office listening to a taped Intel report on the war. The implication is he is agonizing about the dire situation there. Good argument on the surface. He'd thought he would go in, kick ass, and come home. Sound hauntingly familiar? Things weren't going so well for the big guy from Texas by this time and then, it got even worse.
Beyond the agony of the moment was a guy who murdered to get to the chair in which he agonized. And on the way he muscled his way to the top. Then Kennedy pulled the rug out from under him when he won the nomination in 1960. JFK selects him as running mate and they win. Did JFK have reservations? Probably! But Kennedy needed Johnson's help in the south and his ties to Jewish Americans' (brokering Israel's want for the bomb at the time) influence on the Jewish vote.
2nd in command is not what Johnson had lied, cheated, snaked, muscled, raped, clawed, bought, stole, kissed ass, sucked dick, MURDERED his way to the top to settle for. Kennedy was highly likely to be re-elected in 64. That meant LBJ had to wait 'til 68 to run. He'd be 60 then. And, though he couldn't know it at the time, he'd be dead 5 years later.
Could he wait? Could he discredit his nemesis without discrediting his party in the process? Get rid of the beastie baby without sacrificing the holy bath water? Could he stand in the darkness of the wings that long? Subordinate to the man he hated with all his passion? He was far from alone in that hatred. There were many in positions of power who hated Kennedy for myriad reasons but mostly because he was in power and hugely popular with the people. Camelot was here to stay and Camelot was anything but their idea of utopia.
What was he really agonizing about beyond that picture? No way was he about to step down. Despite public opposition to the war he was still polling well. He'd railroaded and muscled in a ton of legislation, like the Civil Rights Act,.that had majority of public support. And suddenly, he quits. Just like that. I seriously doubt, not even for one fleeting second, that Viet Nam was the reason.
Kennedy's killing was a traumatic event for this nation too and has remained such throughout nearly 44 years now. Not to mention that of his brother and MLK. Many hold the official story to be false. Many hold open the possibility the hit was made by sinister forces other than Oswald and some even hold to the idea that these forces were our own leaders and/or those who control them behind the scenes. We hold open to it for various reasons not the least of which is an incredible mountain of circumstantial evidence.
But nobody knew for sure. Nobody had the smoking gun. If they did, they weren't talking. E Howard Hunt handed it to us. And his son has gotten a number of emails and contact from others "in the know" who, "off the record," confirm what Hunt said and wrote in his own hand.
We can deal with maybe's. We can deal with circumstantial evidence. We can deal with half-truths. We can deal with lies. We can even find ways to deal with life in the wake of traumatic events like the JFK assassination or 9/11.
But, confronted with the un-deniable truth that agents on our own side conspired to carry out a coup including the killing of a sitting president, we go wacko! We just can't fathom it and we can dream up all sorts of ways to dispel or twist or question the reality and explain the evidence away.
This is one way how denial works. We find ways to deny the un-deniable. And this is one way why its so easy to get away with the horrid truth.
Psychologists call it a defense mechanism. There is truth to that.
But which truth is more important? Which truth has us by the short hairs in the long run... in the grand scheme of things? The truth of a defense mechanism developed and honed to perfection to protect us from the reality of what we interpret to be unsurvivable truth? Or the truth of the reality of what has actually happened?
Which one sustains life in the long haul and which one leads to inevitable death? And which one leads us to being controlled by others?
Think about it.
That was thirty years ago and ever since hundreds have borrowed or stole that hook line to further their own agendas. Up until today the latest was Sara Evans who used it as the title cut for her highly acclaimed, freshman CD.
Today I'm stealing it to pen this entry.
The truth...
LBJ, Lyndon Baines Johnson, 36th president of the United States, WAS A LEAD PLAYER IN THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK, John Fitzgerald Kennedy, the 35th president of the United States on November, 22, 1963!
It was likely sanctioned by powers greater than he lurking behind the scenes. But he was a primary force.
The operative word here is COUP.
And coups are seldom pulled off alone. By that I mean by one boss. Its almost always a cabal at the top. An alignment between a few to several who conspire toward an end. It can probaly be argued that LBJ was just a pawn in the game. Maybe we'll never know for sure. But given what was at stake for LBJ its admittable to consider him as a major player. As a part of the cabal that ordered and carried out the hit. Yes, carried out. "Cuz, a hit like this? You don't contract something like this. Its done in-house. Today we're going to take a look at the recently revealed truth and the 3 chords in the nasty song that implicates LBJ in the JFK killing. The chords were the operatives carrying out the agenda.
The three chords...
CORD MEYER>>>DAVID MORALES>>>FRENCH GUNMAN GRASSY KNOLL!!
There are minor chords that spin off the majors...
Cord Meyer (ironic name eh?)>>>Bill Harvey
Who's the Harlan Howard? The author? The tell-all teller of the truth?
E. HOWARD HUNT.
Harlan Howard. Howard Hunt. Another irony eh?
Who's E Howard Hunt?
E Howard Hunt. was a CIA operative known most widely as leader of the plumbers of Watergate fame. 3 years before Hunt died in Jan at the crusty old age of 88, he sat sat up in his sickbed, put pen to pad, and laid down the truth. At the top of the page he wrote "LBJ". Then drew a down arrow and wrote "Cord Meyer". According to Hunt, Meyer was an easy mark. His wife, the former Mary Pinchot, was one of JFK's favorite mistresses. Not only did they share the bed, they shared the bowl. Pinchot Meyer was murdered less than a year after JFK.
Below Meyer another down arrow. Then, "David Morales".
Then another down arrow and below that, "French Gunman Grassy Knoll".
To the right of Meyer was another arrow connecting to the name Bill Harvey.
Meyer, Morales, and Harvey are former CIA operatives and pop up midst various conspiracy theories surrounding the Kennedy killing. Presumably the French gunman is the Corsican Mafia assassin Lucien Sarti, who has figured prominently in assassination theories as well.
It is also widely held that Hunt was indeed one of the famed three "tramps" intercepted, detained, photographed and released without arrest or charges near the grassy knoll at the Dealy Plaza scene of the assassination of Kennedy.
How do we know all this? Hunt's eldest son, Saint John, has the goodies. Obtained from his father and reported by Eric Hedgegaard in the March 07 edition of Rolling Stone Rolling Stone.
Read the Rolling Stone article. It tells Saint John's story who is telling his dad's story. Listen to what his dad said in a tape he sent to his son. View a copy of the paper upon which his dad connected the dots of the major players.
Read in St John's story in the RS article of how he came to suspect many years ago that his father was involved. The epiphany was the photo of the 3 tramps. "Nobody has features like my father. I'm his son. That's him!" Read how he tells of helping his dad wipe fingerprints from microphones and walkie talkies and various other articles of espionage in the middle of the night and then, following his father's instruction, "got rid of it". And the 100 grand he ran for him. And the typewriter thrown in the lake for him. All this in the wake of Watergate investigations. The article reports there is another hand written document by E Howard with more details and names.
In the wake of the RS publication St John was contacted by 60 Minutes. A meeting was had in San Francisco between he and an executive producer. He told the producer the whole story, showed him the documents and played the tape for him. Producer flew back to New York where the network's investigative team had both the handwriting and the voice print analyzed by independent experts which concluded beyond a doubt that the author was indeed E Howard Hunt. The excited producer contacted St John. He said everything had checked out, said this was a major story, and promised a piece would be done. That has never happened and St John's queries to CBS are being ignored.
Nowhere in mainstream media will you find anything about this bombshell. But there is a renewed effort going on to reinforce the Oswald-lone-assassin conclusion. Most notable is recent documentary by the Discovery Channel and a new book by Vincent Bugliosi of Helter Skelter fame. Bugliosi was on one of those radio talk shows recently and the interviewer told him about the tape. Bugliosi said he doubted such a tape existed. The interviewer just happened to have a copy all cued up and played it for Bugliosi.
Bugliosi's response? "Saint John Hunt is not a credible source."
Those words are being reiterated by anyone who is presented with the tape who has some unseen interest in furthering the lone assassination theory. If you read the Stone interview you know Saint John Hunt was a meth addict and dealer for 20 years. Arrested for it too. At least twice. So certainly his past is shady and can lead one to question his credibility.
BUT.....
Is it his voice on the tape? Is it his handwriting on the papers?
HELL NO!
So his credibility is a moot issue.
Just what is going on here? Think about it. Can the psyche deal with the reality? That a president could be so evil and power hungry that he would have his predecessor killed on live TV in front of the whole nation? Is this why so many people can't see the current president for what he really is?
St John was interviewed on Coast2Coast AM and I listened to the archived edition last night. I told my Dear Wife (DW) about the tape, the papers, and the RS article. I played her part of the interview. It literally threw her into a tizzy. She got heavily triggered by it and couldn't even listen to the tape (which they played during the interview) until she'd moved some through the initial triggers.
It'd triggered me too but not to the extent that it triggered DW. I was listening to the radio when the shots rang out. The moment is burned into my psyche. I still vividly remember exactly what I was doing and where I was at the time. It was a traumatic event. I've witnessed years of analysis both official and unofficial. I've done a ton of reading through the years. I highly suspected from the beginning that there were sinister forces involved and it was highly likely LBJ was involved.
I also highly suspected that LBJ, like many of our so-called leaders, was an operative in service to hidden, yet extremely powerful, forces that controlled him and us then, and control us still today. Why else would a good-ole-boy, street fighter, who had attained the highest political position in the nation, step down unless he was clandestinely forced to?
Viet Nam you say? You say he showed deep concern for what was happening in Viet Nam as witnessed by this photo ? He's in the oval office listening to a taped Intel report on the war. The implication is he is agonizing about the dire situation there. Good argument on the surface. He'd thought he would go in, kick ass, and come home. Sound hauntingly familiar? Things weren't going so well for the big guy from Texas by this time and then, it got even worse.
Beyond the agony of the moment was a guy who murdered to get to the chair in which he agonized. And on the way he muscled his way to the top. Then Kennedy pulled the rug out from under him when he won the nomination in 1960. JFK selects him as running mate and they win. Did JFK have reservations? Probably! But Kennedy needed Johnson's help in the south and his ties to Jewish Americans' (brokering Israel's want for the bomb at the time) influence on the Jewish vote.
2nd in command is not what Johnson had lied, cheated, snaked, muscled, raped, clawed, bought, stole, kissed ass, sucked dick, MURDERED his way to the top to settle for. Kennedy was highly likely to be re-elected in 64. That meant LBJ had to wait 'til 68 to run. He'd be 60 then. And, though he couldn't know it at the time, he'd be dead 5 years later.
Could he wait? Could he discredit his nemesis without discrediting his party in the process? Get rid of the beastie baby without sacrificing the holy bath water? Could he stand in the darkness of the wings that long? Subordinate to the man he hated with all his passion? He was far from alone in that hatred. There were many in positions of power who hated Kennedy for myriad reasons but mostly because he was in power and hugely popular with the people. Camelot was here to stay and Camelot was anything but their idea of utopia.
What was he really agonizing about beyond that picture? No way was he about to step down. Despite public opposition to the war he was still polling well. He'd railroaded and muscled in a ton of legislation, like the Civil Rights Act,.that had majority of public support. And suddenly, he quits. Just like that. I seriously doubt, not even for one fleeting second, that Viet Nam was the reason.
Kennedy's killing was a traumatic event for this nation too and has remained such throughout nearly 44 years now. Not to mention that of his brother and MLK. Many hold the official story to be false. Many hold open the possibility the hit was made by sinister forces other than Oswald and some even hold to the idea that these forces were our own leaders and/or those who control them behind the scenes. We hold open to it for various reasons not the least of which is an incredible mountain of circumstantial evidence.
But nobody knew for sure. Nobody had the smoking gun. If they did, they weren't talking. E Howard Hunt handed it to us. And his son has gotten a number of emails and contact from others "in the know" who, "off the record," confirm what Hunt said and wrote in his own hand.
We can deal with maybe's. We can deal with circumstantial evidence. We can deal with half-truths. We can deal with lies. We can even find ways to deal with life in the wake of traumatic events like the JFK assassination or 9/11.
But, confronted with the un-deniable truth that agents on our own side conspired to carry out a coup including the killing of a sitting president, we go wacko! We just can't fathom it and we can dream up all sorts of ways to dispel or twist or question the reality and explain the evidence away.
This is one way how denial works. We find ways to deny the un-deniable. And this is one way why its so easy to get away with the horrid truth.
Psychologists call it a defense mechanism. There is truth to that.
But which truth is more important? Which truth has us by the short hairs in the long run... in the grand scheme of things? The truth of a defense mechanism developed and honed to perfection to protect us from the reality of what we interpret to be unsurvivable truth? Or the truth of the reality of what has actually happened?
Which one sustains life in the long haul and which one leads to inevitable death? And which one leads us to being controlled by others?
Think about it.
posted by Palooka's Revenge at 6/10/2007 06:34:00 PM
1 Comments:
Palooka,
I read St. John's interview and I'm glad you added the other information to it. Nothing has been the same in this country since JFK's assassination. The country died that day. And now we are multiple crimes and coverups later and it just continues to deteriorate, like a malignancy that spreads all over.
Post a Comment
<< Home